this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
276 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] probableprotogen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (35 children)

Finally, Microsoft caught up to Linux.

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (29 children)

Linux still unable to catch up with NTFS when it comes to filename length, sadly. 256 bytes in an era of Unicode is ridiculous.

[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

Linux might have a similar file name restriction, but what's more important IMO, is the obnoxious file path restrictions NTFS has.

Naming a file less than 255 chars is a lot easier than keeping its path down.

Limiting file name is one thing, but dealing with limited path lengths when trying to move a custies folder full of subdir on subdirs is obnoxious when the share name its being transferred to makes it just too long.

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Can't you work around that with the extended length prefix of \\?\ (\\?\C:\whateverlongpathhere\)? Though admittedly, it is a pain in the ass to use.

(edited for clarity and formatting)

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That would unfortunately require me to edit GPO I have non control over. I could temporarily knock it out with regedit but I don't know if it'd be tossed next gpupdate, I'd have to check.

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 months ago

Bummer. The '\?' prefix will work regardless of registry setting, though it's a pain to remember each time.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)