this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
1190 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
3175 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • YouTube is intensifying efforts to combat adblockers, including blocking video playback and warning users of potential account suspension.
  • Increased ads on YouTube have driven many users to adblockers, hurting both YouTube’s ad revenue and content creators reliant on ad-based income.
  • Despite these measures, many users are leaving YouTube or finding workarounds, leading creators to seek alternative revenue streams off-platform.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 97 points 3 months ago (19 children)

Despite all of their machinations my strategy of simply ignoring literally everything they say and continuing doing the same old same old appears to be flummoxing them.

I've literally not done anything and have never experienced any inconvenience. Are we sure they're doing anything at all?

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Same, I think they must be AB testing and I don't get assigned into the shitty group

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I definitely got really awful, unplayably spotty playback that seemed linked to adblock usage. Then I saw an article about it and confirmed I wasn't going crazy, and that day it stopped happening, so it felt like I was going crazy all over again. It's like the moment they realised it was going to become a problem and they weren't as sneaky as they thought, they turned it off. I haven't had an issue since then.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 10 points 3 months ago

I had the same experience with shitty playback buffering every few seconds on popular videos that should be cached on a nearby cdn, and then saw lots of articles about it and then boom a week later everything was back to normal

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That would be quite a funny strategy that they could definitely implement. Creepy as hell but clever.

They know everything you do and look at, so they know if you're the sort of person that would look up a fix for this or just take it on the nose. If they realize you're looking at articles about the problem they just turn the function off.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I guess that's possible, and a very creepy thought, but more likely they saw the level of general attention on the issue and backed off globally.

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The kicker there is ... Nobody I know is going to think "wow, playback on this video sucks, I should disable my ad blocker".

Like, it wouldn't occur to ANYONE I know that a piece of software we consider necessary could be the problem, ESPECIALLY if everything else is working fine.

That's not even number ten on the list of troubleshooting steps and most people don't make it past one or two before giving up.

WTF were they thinking?

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 months ago

Honestly it sounds like someone was paid to do something about adblocking and just like... did something. Like if you were tasked with reducing adblocking, and your first and most obvious idea of "reduce the obnoxious ads" was disallowed because enshittification is mandated, you could say no, which most workers won't do, or you could just do whatever random bullshit feels like it might work because it's punitive. Or at least it's a gesture that shows your boss you're trying.

Authoritarian systems like capitalist corporations are inherently low-information for exactly this reason. People on the low rungs doing the real work who understand what needs to be done will typically not report problems to their superiors. And when they do, those superiors tend not to listen, because the idea that lower workers know something they don't threatens their leadership status.

Also our society's legal system trains us to believe punitive measures must do something even though they don't.

Also I guess another reason they might wind up at this strategy is that straight up telling users that the problem is their adblock is the fastest way to get adblockers to block your countermeasure, so they think they have to be sneaky.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago

They are definitely AB testing things like rejecting ad blockers.

load more comments (16 replies)