Games

16806 readers

832 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

194

Indiana Jones and the Great Circle devs say an Indy game 'could never be a shooter, should never be a shooter,' so they're embracing his signature whip, improvised brawls, and disguise-based stealth.. (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 3 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But that's not what that analysis was about. It's about whether or not it would be suitable for a game on indy to be a shooter and trying to see how synonymous he is with shooting. The Devs saying that him using a gun is rare. But this comment was comparing deaths by other means vs guns. Instead of just combat with guns vs other means.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

i don't get what u mean. what else does he shoot? the point is gun combat is not the point of the movies. shouldn't he the point of the games either. he's known for hit hat and whip more than his gun.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not arguing for it being a shooter. In arguing against it. Saying that comparing the deaths he caused and how is less indicative because there's more combat sequences that don't end in death, removing them skewed the data to make it look like our war almost a 50/50 on whether he used a gun or not in any given encounter. That's wrong. That's what I was saying.