this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
327 points (92.5% liked)

Technology

72739 readers
1582 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Sure, Microsoft is happy to let their AIs scan everyone else’s code., but is anyone aware of any software houses letting AIs scan their in-house code?

Any lawyer worth their salt won’t let AIs anywhere near their company’s proprietary code intil they are positive that AI isn’t going to be blabbing the code out to every one of their competitors.

But of course, IANAL.

[–] hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 10 months ago (6 children)

The LLMs they train on their code will only be accessible internally. They won’t leak their own intellectual property.

[–] JustJack23@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Will that not be more experiensive than having developers?

[–] androogee@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

Of course not. It will be more expensive and they'll still have to pay developers to figure out what's wrong with their AI code.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)