this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
163 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3197 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Many years ago my grandfather was involved in an air force test of aerial defense platforms that used balloons.

The idea was you could station these things all around the country and at the first sign of an attack you could have missiles launched from 10k feet to anywhere from anywhere.

The test encountered two problems that caused them to abandon the idea.

These balloons were incredibly easy to shoot down. Which would, presumably, rain volatile rocket fuel and munitions down on whatever was beneath them.

And if a missile launched, but failed to separate completely from it's housing, it would carry that balloon on a wild, unpredictable trajectory, until it collided with something or it decided it had reached it's detonation time.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ideally, however, these would not be shot down.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's just it, they're an easy target, and communications infrastructure is one of the first things you want to control or eliminate if you're taking hostile territory.

[–] Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, and? I don't believe these are replacing any existing infrastructure, but are for places that have no infrastructure for the internet. They could drastically improve things in those areas, and if those place became a warzone sometime in the future they'd probably be pretty fucked with or without proper land based infrastructure.

[–] BelatedPeacock@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Ideally internet debates wouldn't get THAT heated though.