this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
65 points (93.3% liked)
Fediverse
28444 readers
664 users here now
A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).
If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!
Rules
- Posts must be on topic.
- Be respectful of others.
- Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
- Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.
Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It means that the instance admins have a higher responsibility towards their own users, mods and communities wishes.
Yeah well i don't think they should lock that community if the mod doesn't want it to be locked. Do you really think that would be right? Should i go and demand the solarpunk bird community to be locked because world's is more active? I think it'd be pretty bad if they did, not that i think they would. Also i don't think that user you called out is part of world's staff.
The paradox of choice is something you have deal with in the fediverse i guess, starts at choosing a server. I don't think it should be that big of a deal, as long as communities can be found from the instances internal search.
I still don't think they keep us from being upgraded to be mean.
It's up to debate, but to me if the mod isn't active for the community (e.g. posting regularly), they should ask for someone else to take up that role. And if nobody wants the role, and there is another active community to redirect too, it could be nice to lock the inactive community down and redirect to the active one.
I mod a few inactive communities (such as !harrypotter@literature.cafe ). If someone came to me and said "hey, we've been trying to get our own HP community active, you already have some people on yours, would you mind locking yours down as you don't seem to actively mod it, and redirect to ours?" I would definitely do it.
They are not, but at the same time the LW rules still allow them to namesquat that community.
For the instance, as long as you take the big ones (LW, lemm.ee, SJW, dbzer0, lemmy.ca, etc.), your experience will indeed be the same. To know which community to post too, this is a different story, and I've seen a lot of people telling me "I stay on Reddit because when I when to post about a topic, there's a clear community where to. On Lemmy, there are two or three active communities competing for the same topic, and it's just confusing". Of course we should keep different communities for different folks (no one would consider merging lemmy.ml communities with LW's), but we can also reduce the confusion for a few core topics that can help new joiners to get settled
They are not, but as I said earlier, LW is so large than they have to be extra cautious with their updates. If they would be 20% of the total Lemmy population, and 30 of the top 100 communities compared to now, they would probably be more at ease with "me can mess up a bit, it's okay". Having them as a cornerstone of the whole platform puts them constantly under the spotlight.
So i had another look. I think it's actually kinda crazy that you demand they should lock the dataisbeautiful community. The world one has a bunch of different users posting stuff to it, in the mander one it is 50% you. The mods are all active lemmy users, max three months since last comment (and we don't know when they last logged in to lemmy). You just claim it is an unmanaged community, but it looks just fine to me, no spam or whatever. And i don't agree at all that mods necessarily need to be actively posting into the communities they mod.
Quoting the quote where you mentioned me in that other topic
This does not apply to the world community, but i guess to the ones other than mander, ml and world:
The ml community is also not locked btw.
And i don't see how this could be fixed in the lemmyverse, having multiple communities for same topic? It is just part of how this works? It is also kinda easy to tell by these search results which communities might be active. And if you're interested in the topic, you'd subscribe to all of them (active ones). That's how it was a year ago too, when i looked for communities of my interest.
Honestly i understand you less after looking into it more. I mean i get the desire to spread out communities and i think it would be a good thing, but you can't just force your will onto other people and their ideas like that.
Well then we agree that it seems to be fine how they do it.