I know they're quite different technically. But practically, what does ActivityPub unlock that was not previously possible with RSS and basic web tech stack?

I think I have an idea of the answer. RSS may provide a way for users to "subscribe" to content from a feed, equivalent of following and putting it in a unified feed.

But it does not have a way for users to interact with the poster, like comments or likes. This may be possible with a basic web stack though, but either users will have to make accounts on every person's site, or the site has to accept no user auth. (but this could be resolved with a identity provider standard, like disqus does)

I suppose another thing activityPub does is distribute content to multiple servers. Not sure if this is really desirable though?

Anyways, did I miss anything?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're right, it is hand wavy.

But I think it is valid for every blog to have things like comments and likes in their own way, if they're okay with users not being authenticated.

But yes, it makes sense this is where activity Pub shines.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But I don't understand what you are trying to argue. Do you think that AP is only meant to be a single improvement about existing implementation for (micro)blogs?

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago

Not arguing anything, just asking questions to confirm my understanding (and I believe I got my answers so we're good).

I don't know what you mean by single improvement, but I don't think that is my position, no.