I know they're quite different technically. But practically, what does ActivityPub unlock that was not previously possible with RSS and basic web tech stack?

I think I have an idea of the answer. RSS may provide a way for users to "subscribe" to content from a feed, equivalent of following and putting it in a unified feed.

But it does not have a way for users to interact with the poster, like comments or likes. This may be possible with a basic web stack though, but either users will have to make accounts on every person's site, or the site has to accept no user auth. (but this could be resolved with a identity provider standard, like disqus does)

I suppose another thing activityPub does is distribute content to multiple servers. Not sure if this is really desirable though?

Anyways, did I miss anything?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I fully agree with you, but I think this isn't because RSS clients can't do this from a technical perspective. I suppose most RSS clients come from people with anti algorithm sentiment, but realistically, a RSS client has all what it needs to implement basic or advanced sorting and filtering.

But I agree with you that most rss readers out there have that problem.

[–] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

I suppose the same could be said on the lemmy side. There's no reason someone couldn't write a lemmy app that lets you do what an RSS client does in terms of only showing content from a selected subgroup of communities.