this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
134 points (89.0% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Generative AI Has a Visual Plagiarism Problem::Experiments with Midjourney and DALL-E 3 show a copyright minefield

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

I'm getting really tired of this shit. These images are so heavily cherry picked. If you put those prompts into Midjourney you may get things similar, but they aren't going to be anywhere near that. My guess: someone used the copyrighted images as part of the prompt, but is leaving that bit out of their documentation. I use Midjourney daily, and it's a struggle to get what I want most of the time, and generic prompts like what they show won't get it there. Yes, you can roll the prompt over and over and over again, but coming up with something as precise as what they have is a chance in a million on your first roll or even 100th. I'll attach the "90's cartoon" prompt to illustrate my point.

The minion bit is pretty accurate, but the Simpsons is WAAAAY off. The thing is, that it didn't return copyrighted images, it returned strange amalgams of things that it blends together in its algorithms. Getting exact scenes from movies isn't something it's going to just give you. You have to make an effort to get those, and just putting in "half-way through Infinity War" won't do it.

At best that falls under fair use. If a human made it, it would be fanart, and not copyrighted scenes. This is all just lawyers looking to get rich on a new fad by pouring fear into rich movie studios, celebrities, and publishers. "Look at this! It looks just like yours! We can sue them, and you'll get 25% of that we win after my fees. Trust me, it's ironclad. Of course, I'll need my fees upfront."

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The new version of midjourney has a real overfitting problem. The way it was done if I remember correctly is that someone found out v6 was trained partially with Stockbase images pairs, so they went to Stockbase and found some images and used those exact tags in the prompts. The output from that greatly resembled the training data, and that's what ignited this whole thing.

Edit: I found the image I saw a few days ago. They need to go back and retrain their model, IMO. When the output is this close to the training, it has to be hurting the creativity of the model. This should only happen with images that haven't been de-duped in the training set, so I don't know what's going on here.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In 15 minutes I can get Google to give me a link to pirated content. Hosting links to pirated content gets you arrested in the US. But Google doesn't just give you the pirate links which is why it is legal. It's a tool that you can use to get them if you work at it a little.

[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

I'm not arguing on the side of the detractors, I just think the model could produce better output than this.

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

They’ll do anything to slow the progress of publically accessible power.

Fight them tooth and nail. Self governance over interference from ignorant, decrepit politicians.

Also stop using copyrighted materials when training. You put in the extra mile now, and you’ll be able to make your own (automated) copyright material.

[–] natsume_shokogami@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The problem is that I think despite the "war" on the surface between copyright holders and LLM/diffusion model corporations, they are actually cooperating with each other to ensure that they would still be able to exploit their creators and artists by replacing them with the models or underpay or otherwise mistreat them, while taking away any chance of competitors or normal people to access to the large language/stable diffusion models or public domain and free/open culture works.

Oh, it is not even "secretly" anymore since many of the same copyright holders actually announced they would replace the creators with LLMs/stable diffusion models, and soon maybe even some of the corporations filing the lawsuits since they would realize they can have benefits from those people than pretending to listening to the mass.

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

For the record, AI research and capabilities aren’t locked to premium services or businesses.

It’s a mathematical concept that often are publically published. Don’t forget this sector belongs to techies and enthusiasts just as it is to career “researchers”

So long as the govt doesn’t touch concept, we can make and make and make to our hearts content. Training data is also collectible and source-able by anyone.

Last, I’m not against collaboration with a potential enemy so long as it benefits both parties equally and doesn’t exacerbate any existing problems or imbalances in power

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 10 months ago

That Tree God on the bottom right looks really neat, and a worthy addition to the "Villain with legitimate grievances that murders for no good reason" club

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I'm sorry to tell you but fanart is subjected to copyright, as are all derivative works that aren't sufficiently transformative, even if they aren't used commercially. It's a subjective measure but I doubt any judge would say those top images are completely distinct from the Minions or Simpsons. What happens is that usually the rights owners don't chase every single infringement, out of goodwill or simply because it would be too expensive to litigate every unauthorized use.

To be fair personally I think that's excessive. But I believe so especially because it makes artists lives more difficult. However AI isn't making it any easier either...

[–] burliman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you for saying this way better than I would have, and saving me the effort too! Agreed! I am getting tired of this shit too.