this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
31 points (89.7% liked)

Selfhosted

40296 readers
311 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ruud@lemmy.world
Loki@lemmy.world
CannaVet@lemmy.world
devve@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world
HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz
31
What do people here think of Nebula? (lemm.ee)
submitted 2 months ago by milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been playing around with self hosting for file sharing, backups, and a handful of other ideas I might one day get round to. I like the idea of a mesh VPN and being able to, for example, connect a travelling laptop to a 'host' laptop nearby, though my only public ip is a VPS in another country.

Of all the options I found, I liked the look of Nebula most. Fiddly in some places, but it's working nicely for me, and I appreciate some of the simplicity of design.

I'm wondering if people here have much experience of it, though? My biggest concern is over its future. With,

  1. The Defined Networking site focusing on making money off it, and
  2. The Android app doesn't allow full configuration (including the firewall, so I can't host a website from a phone) but - I heard - does if you use Defined Networking's paid service for configuration,

makes me worry they might be essentially trying to deprecate viable FOSS Nebula in favour of a paid or controlled service.

Any thoughts? Insight?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iso@lemy.lol 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I’m using Headscale for work and Tailscale for personal use. I tried to use Nebula but it’s not easy as Tailscale.

[–] bmcgonag@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Headscale server, open source, self hosted, with the open source tailscale clients are the way to go.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Is Headscale easier than Nebula? I thought it looked like it might become much more work.

Nebula was mostly easy, but had a few hurdles I needed to learn.

  • Setting up systemd. I think I had to look that up and write a startup thing for it. I might have copied one from Syncthing or something! I don't remember right now.
  • firewalls confused me a couple of times
  • and I had to get the hang of the certificate system of course

I have mixed feelings about trying Defined Networking's managed config, but I imagine that would get round the learning curve of the config.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Netbird is easier to use although it is a little less developed

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I took a quick look at the GitHub repo - selfhosted Netbird looks harder and more resource hungry, not easier! At least compared to Nebula.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yep, I tried Tailscale at home... 3 weeks later I started using it at work, so insanely easy.