this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
383 points (95.9% liked)

Greentext

4437 readers
874 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 109 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Drunk people and consent is a moral and legal gray area - it doesn’t matter if they initiate

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Senseless@feddit.org 59 points 2 months ago

Yeah, sure. But since she already threw up, she's drunk enough to make it problematic.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It also depends on what is being consented to. We accept that drunk people can consent to commit crimes, but that they cannot consent to have sex.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 25 points 2 months ago

If drunk people couldn't consent as a rule then like 80% of Finnish one night stands would be double rapes (since both are getting raped by the other party) lol

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And the old "I cheated on you because I was drunk". It's not so heartwarming that people here are belittling rape with what would be considered negligent sexual assault at the worst.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I'm just pointing out a strange legal quandary. Obviously noone should fuck around with consent.

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 months ago

hm, yeah so if you can't consent when drunk, then you also can't cheat when drunk. Because it's non consensual in both cases. (at least intentionally, so it would be a valid excuse in this case)

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

well if someone gets really drunk (not being drugged by others, but doing it because they want to) and commits a crime, thats still a crime they commited

if im wrong please explain

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 months ago

You're wrong, drunk drivers never get fined when they run over someone.

/s

legal gray area - it doesn’t matter if they initiate

is there a legal basis for this statement? There very well could be, i don't do a lot of raping so i wouldn't know anything about this lmao