this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
383 points (95.9% liked)

Greentext

4437 readers
874 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

thats not really helpful, could you explain to me where i was wrong?

i dont mean to sound like "i know im right" or something. i actually just want to know

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Extremely drunk people are not in the state of mind to consent

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

but if they got drunk knowing what they were drinking (like not being drugged or something similar) and commit a crime, they can still be liable, right?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

both things are crimes commited while drunk, and i believe in both instances the person is liable for commiting the crime.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm missing the point. I thought we were talking about consent, and now one cannot give consent while very drunk.

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

i was talking about how she was sexually assaulting the guy