this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
465 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2936 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (7 children)

When that happened our DevOps teams migrated all our prod k8's to podman, with zero issues. Docker who?

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Why would anybody use podman for k8s...containerd is the default for years.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Maybe you can run containerd with podman.. I haven't checked. I just run k3s myself.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but you don't need anything besides the runtime with kubernetes. Podman is completely unnecessary since kubelet does the container orchestration based on Kubernetes control plane. Running podman is like running docker, unnecessary attack surface for an API that is not used by anybody (in Kubernetes).

I run k0s at home, FWIW, tried k3s too :)

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I know.

Interesting that you run k0s, hadn't heard about it. Would you mind giving a quick review and compare it to k3s, pros and cons?

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't really make an exhaustive comparison. I think k3s was a little too opinionated for my taste, with lots of rancher logic in it (paths, ingress, etc.). K0s was a little more "bare", and I had some trouble in the past with k3s with upgrading (encountered some error), while with k0s so far (about 2 years) I never had issues. k0s also has some ansible role that eases operations, I don't know if now also k3s does. Either way, they are quite similar overall so if one is working for you, rest assured you are not missing out.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

I watched some video on YouTube also where k0s seems to be slightly better at throughput, which can matter if your cluster is under heavy load a lot. But yeah, seems to be smaller differences and mostly about taste.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)