this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
465 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
2891 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I know.

Interesting that you run k0s, hadn't heard about it. Would you mind giving a quick review and compare it to k3s, pros and cons?

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I can't really make an exhaustive comparison. I think k3s was a little too opinionated for my taste, with lots of rancher logic in it (paths, ingress, etc.). K0s was a little more "bare", and I had some trouble in the past with k3s with upgrading (encountered some error), while with k0s so far (about 2 years) I never had issues. k0s also has some ansible role that eases operations, I don't know if now also k3s does. Either way, they are quite similar overall so if one is working for you, rest assured you are not missing out.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

I watched some video on YouTube also where k0s seems to be slightly better at throughput, which can matter if your cluster is under heavy load a lot. But yeah, seems to be smaller differences and mostly about taste.