this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
1279 points (96.9% liked)

Memes

45779 readers
2147 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago (83 children)

I mean, this is how businesses work in general. If you don't buy their products/services, then they wouldn't be able to continue providing them.

I understand that we're trying to draw attention to exploitative landlords, but if anyone can afford to keep their property regardless of whether or not you pay rent, it's the exploitative ones.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 months ago (80 children)

The problem is that landlords don't create value, they seek to endlessly profit off of one time labor. Rent-seeking creates no real Value of any substance.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

They do create value. They provide maintenance free housing as well as short term housing (short term as in 1-3 years.) Not everyone wants to stay in the same location for 5+ years. If you move around alot It you want to rent is usually the better option.

Now sure you could argue they are over charging for that service but that doesn't mean they aren't providing value.

The only reason why we are having issues is because there is a housing shortage that is raising the price and large companies have taken advantage of this by buying up all the houses at the crazy price and renting them out at crazy rent prices eating up the market for actual people to want to buy a house.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They do create value. They provide maintenance free housing as well as short term housing (short term as in 1-3 years.) Not everyone wants to stay in the same location for 5+ years. If you move around alot It you want to rent is usually the better option.

The ability to rent is useful, but the idea that endlessly profiting off of the same property and doing minor maintenance is creating Value is silly. There's no Value being created through simply owning something. Maintenance creates Value, yes, but that does not make up anywhere close to the profit of landlording.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Value is created by the use of something. If someone is living in a house then it is providing value.

As long as the something is useful it can provide value endlessly.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

What is "Value?" We are talking about different things here under the same term. You are referring to "Use-Value" as Value itself. A Use-Value being created has a Value, it will provide it's Use-Value until it is consumed fully.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

No. It's not large companies. It's a sickness inherent in the system and exactly what this is taking about. The only service being provided is leveraging their own credit to get a mortgage from the bank and then paying that mortgage and taxes with rent. They do that because it will decrease supply and increase value. And that's a parasitic practice done not just by large companies by any means. In my city they even subcontract for maintenance and also pay for that out of the rent. If we're doing this shit, why exactly aren't we just letting the renters own their equity for paying the goddamn mortgage. It's a disgusting system.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They provide maintenance free housing...

Keep in mind this isn't always the case. Landlords where I used to live are increasingly requiring tenants to pay for some maintenance costs. A past landlord had us pay for anything $300 or less.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Where in the world is that? I have never heard of renters paying for maintenance.

In fact, every single rental agreement I signed over 25 years said "contact the landlord if there is a problem" which was backed up by state law.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Idaho, the South of the North. I now live in Washington, where that kind of shit doesn't fly.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Free" as it isn't the renters responsibility. If something breaks they call the landlord and say fix it.

Obviously the maintenance cost will be baked into the rent cost, or as an added fee as shown in your example.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We had to fix it or arrange to have it fixed, then the landlord would verify it was fixed to their satisfaction. The landlord was otherwise hands off until it exceeded the cost limit. This was the norm for the area.

[–] Catsrules@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ahh ok, I miss read your comment.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

No, you're fine! I didn't specify. I lived with it for so long, it didn't even occur to me to outline the process.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social -2 points 2 months ago

This incentivizes the tenant to worsen any problems so the landlord has to pay.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Robbing tenants of potential equity is not a service.

load more comments (75 replies)
load more comments (77 replies)