Greentext

4437 readers

904 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

Anon is often crazy.
Anon is often depressed.
Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works

699

Anon explains the 2nd amendment (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 2 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works

133 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Making them shoot an unarmed group of protesters is much harder than making them shoot an armed one.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lol, well they had no problems seriously wounding the unarmed BLM protesters by shooting them with “rubber” bullets.

They wouldn’t touch the right wingnuts showed up at protests with guns.

They also wouldn’t touch an armed group distributing food to homeless and needy

They didn’t touch the Bundy’s when they took over the wildlife refuge offices in an armed standoff.

So cops are fine shooting at unarmed people, but if they’re going to face well armed threats they play nice.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yep. Doesn't even have to be a group of armed people doing "maybe illegal" things. It can be a single person doing absolutely illegal and horrific things...like Uvalde.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

Not in USA