this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
577 points (99.7% liked)

Games

16806 readers
832 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
577
Games featuring paid loot boxes will soon receive a mandatory 'M' rating in Australia (www.gamedeveloper.com)
submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Australians do. As do international companies selling to the Australian market.

[–] Oneser@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

As clarification I meant: "do people in Australia care about the tiny black and white sticker on the box which says "M - rated for mature audiences" now?"

and not: "why should the global community give a damn about Australia...".

I remember cinemas were always strict with entry into movies, but game shops never used to ask for ID. Has this changed?

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Penalties will vary between states but for NSW the maximum fines for selling games with restricted classifications to underage customers are:

. MA15+ R18+
sold by individual $5.5k $11k
sold by corporation $11k $22k

https://www6.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cfacgea1995596/s30.html
https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/cpa1999278/s17.html

These seem steep enough to encourage compliance.

But G, PG, or M? The customers age is none of their business and I wouldn't expect them to take an interest.

Edit: to put those penalties in perspective the sentencing for supplying alcohol to minors scales up a maximum of $11k and/or 12 months incarceration.
https://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/la2007107/s117.html

While for tobacco the maximum penalties are:

. first offence subsequent offences
sold by individual $11k $55k
sold by corporation $55k $110k

https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/pha2008178/s22.html

So it looks like it is penalized significantly more lightly than alcohol or tobacco.

[–] Affidavit@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Ah, that is not how your initial comment came across. Though I guess you realise that now.

I honestly don't recall ever encountering any bars on buying video games as a kid, or even knowing that ratings existed, though it could just be because my parents bought most of my games. I think you're right that very few people in Australia care about ratings. To me, it's clear that ratings are almost entirely arbitrary. It's obvious that big developers get more leeway in how their products are rated than smaller developers anyway.