Games

16806 readers

832 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

341

EA execs say generative AI is "not merely a buzzword for us, it's the very core of our business," then pretend to tell a computer to generate buildings live on stage (www.gamesradar.com)

submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe deterministic wasn't quite the correct word but basically it only gives you a result that resembles your previous result if you change absolutely nothing, not the training data for the model, not the model, not the random seed, not the prompt,... which makes it useless for iteratively approaching a usable result. I guess the output space is not contiguous might be a better way to describe it.

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Right, technically deterministic, but not practically