this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
73 points (96.2% liked)

Games

16800 readers
789 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
73
Nintendo Patent Approved in August Could Be What It Uses Against Palworld (gamerant.com)
submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've heard this a few times, but what does it ultimately mean? Doesn't it mean that, if they desired, they could still operate and just not sell in Japan? Granted, obviously, if the dev is Japanese (I have no idea in this case and don't feel like looking) then they'd have some issues, but for a western developer, it'd still be bad, losing all Japanese sales, but overall manageable.

[–] ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer, so my knowledge is limited, but from what I understand, you can only make a claim for a patent infringement in the country where the company responsible for the infringement is located.

So they have this patent in Japan, but if I make a Pokémon-like game but I'm from, say, France, where this patent doesn't exist, Nintendo can only suck it up and cope, because they don't have a patent for this in France.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this the scenario the Patent Cooperation Treaty was intended to resolve?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_Cooperation_Treaty

[–] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm not a lawyer but, I know when you file for a patent you can do that in just one country or internationally (which is significantly more expensive). Skimming through the Wikipedia article it seems to be talking about that, but first you need to have filed for the patent internationally and not in just one country.

From what I've read about this topic, it sounds like this is a patent active in Japan only.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh! So that treaty somewhat standardizes PA patent rights across participating nations and allows a the patent office to act as a agent in procuring international patents but doesn't actually offers a "globally" recognized patent in the way that the Berne Convention does for copyright.

So it looks like the infamous loading screen minigame patent was only registered in Japan and the USA. If I have this right it would not have been a barrier to implementing a loading screen minigame anywhere else (e.g. PAL regions in their entirety)?

https://patents.google.com/patent/US5718632