this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
219 points (95.1% liked)

Games

16785 readers
811 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (8 children)

I'm guessing he signed an NDA so I'm not sure what he was thinking distributing it so publicly.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 38 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Do NDAs last for 25 years or something?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (6 children)

NDA was the wrong term to use there but I'm sure there was a "don't give the game to anyone" in there they might be enforceable. I hope they don't sue, though

[–] AlijahTheMediocre@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't think Valve is going to do anything about a 20 year old beta being leaked.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me neither but it's still a bold move

[–] QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, knowing how easy it is for just about anyone to contact GabeN (his email is publically accessible) and that this was a previous tester, I would say there's decent odds they're already contacted someone to make sure or already had permission to do so in some roundabout way. I have no way of knowing for sure, obviously, but it is super weird for this to pop up without the finder messaging anyone in Valve about it.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think the email of a CEO is a very private matter as you can probably very easily be found if you try hard enough. At least in comparison to telephone, home adresses etc.
I mean it's usually given name, surname + given name, initals and the domain.
So what? tim.cook@apple.com?

Actually the first result for "email ceo apple" gives me the result

What is Tim Cook's email address? Email Tim Cook care/of Apple, tcook@apple.com (Direct) or media.help@apple.com (Media/Public Relations). 🤝 How do I meet Tim Cook?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Some organizations will setup a Honeypot/blackhole CEO email using common corporate email designs, then the actual CEO email will be something else entirely. One organization I worked at the CEO email was a actually just a randomized string

But in the case of Valve, Gabe Newell has generally encouraged people to email him which is unusually open compared to many companies whose leadership will ignore or even threaten anyone who stumbles into their inbox

[–] QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That is certainly true, I guess I needed to specifically call out that he actually does reply. And this has been a constant recurring "rediscovery" every few years that GabeN personally responds to that email.

That also wasn't the particular point I was even talking about. The point was that a previous dev would most likely still have connections inside Valve given how easy it is for outsiders. And that even if they had zero connections, again, it would be super easy to get a response.

This is all just speculation, but a relatively confident one.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)