glimse

joined 2 years ago
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

The company is specifically referencing The Matrix but yeah, that's where Wachowskis got it from

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

...I get that it ties up the has-been thread you started in the first paragraph but The Matrix isn't a once-great movie. It's still great lol

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Man I loooove split pea soup. You can use it as mortar but every spoonful is a warm hug in a way other soups can't match

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is this a bit account? Should the name have clued me in?

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Do you usually post links without reading them?

Interestingly, the study attributes the problems to the drivers not the cars.

Because aside from random catastrophic failure, the vehicle doesn't make you cash. The driver or Tesla's "self-driving" does

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'll bet it's more like

1 in 5 boys either knows someone their age who delusionally thinks they're in a relationship with a chatbot, knows someone who claims they're dating a chatbot as a joke, or is just fucking around

There's a non-insignificant chance the boys they surveyed weren't taking it seriously. "Oh yeah, I totally know someone dating a chatbot"

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes it's Lemmy markdown for superscript. Or at least that's what my client tells me

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Yes, that's the guy!

It was misinformation, though. Q and the most extreme bigots are from 8chan^1^. I don't think you did it deliberately which is why I didn't call it disinformation, it's just not accurate

^1^ Of the chans. There's plenty of forums that make 8chan look tame.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Q is from 8chan. One could argue that 8chan came from 4chan but they were two distinct beasts at the time. 8chan is (was?) where the people too extreme for 4chan went.

Not defending 4chan, just correcting the misinformation.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They said "with tits" and that's not how I would describe the video in the post just because the host is a woman so I didn't think they meant this one in particular

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Same thing as a subway surfers clip playing in the corner

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

Really? When I see a video like that, any horniness is overruled by the ick factor of using sex to advertise. If you need to show off your boobs to get views, I assume the content beyond the boobs isn't worth watching

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/47803911

Lmao

 
 

I was messing around on Bing trying to generate animals camouflaging into various environments but never spit out what I had in mind. It did, however, expose me to furry porn despite my prompt not requesting it.

Some other examples (not including the aforementioned one because I don't want to get banned lol):

 

Based on two rumors/conspiracy theories:

  1. Walt Disney had his body cryogenically preserved in the hopes of being resurrected later. Unsubstantiated but funny

  2. The film was titled "Frozen" so when you search for "Walt Disney Frozen" you don't learn about the first rumor

 
 
view more: next ›