this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
792 points (97.9% liked)

Games

16785 readers
847 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
792
Nintendo would "rather go in a different direction" than follow AI trend, says Miyamoto (www.eurogamer.net)
submitted 1 month ago by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/games@sh.itjust.works
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exanime@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They’re just lucky that the current AI Models are crap, otherwise this would be the next standard they’re missing in their “more of the same since 1980” games.

So you are complaining they are not adopting something you admit is currently crap?!

I'm going to complain about billionaire taxes then, I mean I have no billions but I'll complain anyway

[–] roteradler@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, I'm saying, that Nintendo wouldnt benefit at all from AI, so why should they use it in the first place? And the reasons for that are:

-AI in it's current state can only support in certain areas -Nintendo's games aren't massive enough to profit from the things AI can do atm

An example: AI can do Text to Speech, but Nintendo doesn't make games like TES. Nintendo needs to optimise their games highly to run on a switch, which AI can't do.

He is just stating the obvious, like saying the sun is hot.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He is just stating the obvious, like saying the sun is hot.

But he could say they are engineering to catch up to the trend, right? the question is not if they are to implement AI features in their current 8 year old console. The question is if AI is in their development path in the future

And the answer is no, Nintendo does not seem to see value there. I for one agree, the stuff you mentioned about AI in other comments in the thread go from "meh" to "I actively do not want that in my games". This is just my opinion as a casual gamer but I see logic in Nintendo's stance here.