Technology

59534 readers

3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

454

California will force companies to admit you don't own digital content (www.androidpolice.com)

submitted 1 month ago by dantheclamman@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 52 points 1 month ago (7 children)

tl;dr

California's new law will require digital storefronts to clarify that consumers are buying licenses, not outright ownership of digital goods.

The law forces companies to use distinct language when selling digital media to specify license terms to avoid false advertising fines.

The law goes into effect next yea, but won't apply to companies that offer “permanent offline downloads” of digital goods.

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (6 children)

“permanent offline downloads”

How can anyone offer that?

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

(C )Any digital good that is advertised or offered to a person that the seller cannot revoke access to after the transaction, which includes making the digital good available at the time of purchase for permanent offline download to an external storage source to be used without a connection to the internet.

It shouldn't be that hard, gog.com manages to do it

[–] Goun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Oh I thought they meant having the content permanently available for download, which is impossible. Thanks for the clarification!

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)