this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
130 points (97.1% liked)
Games
16785 readers
830 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There is a pretty substantial community around designing and playing custom stories in DnD. They (presumably because of contracts) didn't make that possible out of the box with BG3/official tools, but the fact that people figured out how to bypass the restrictions means that there's a lot of pre-existing material that really doesn't need to be tailored much to fit into the experience.
It's not no work, because the nature of a human Dungeon Master gives you a lot more flexibility, but there's definitely potential for a big community unless Larian is pushed into doing whack-a-mole bullshit to harass modders.
Thanks, this is exactly what I was trying to ask. What "motivation" potential modders have.
wotc would have to "admit" to doing what the community only suspects (deliberately restricting these tools in the contracts) to harass modders, right? That could be a PR disaster, hence I hope that means they'll turn a blind eye.
I don't know that PR would be a sufficient barrier. They seem perfectly willing to be raging jackasses.
I think the bigger question is whether their contract with Larian is sufficient that they actually have the juice to compel them to take legally questionable action to restrict mods. There are a couple companies that use DMCA shit to harass mods into shutting down, but there really isn't a strong basis behind it. It's just them having a big enough checkbook to not be worth the fight. And even the sketchy "bypassing copy protection" method they usually use isn't relevant to a game that's DRM free. The strongest actual precedent against mods is stuff like Bungie getting judgements against cheat distributors, but that isn't the same, because it's actively degrading the service for others.
My guess is that it won't get shut down because WOTC can't make Larian bully people into shutting it down.
Yes, but this is an offline game, and I've never seen such a warning without some plausible justification. There's no basis for interfering with an online component here, so what would Larian even say as they sent warnings?
Using an legally purchased offline game "illegally" would be quite a precedent, no?
Yeah. Larian didn't seem very interested in blocking this capability (they left all this stuff in the executable), like they did the absolute minimum they were contractually obligated to do lol.
Take-2 has bullied mods that don't connect to their servers claiming it's an illegal derivative work or violates the anti-circumvention clause of the DMCA. If Larian actually wanted to be assholes, they could make life annoying for people who want to make mods.
Again, I don't think there's any actual legal merit behind harassment for mods, but lack of merit isn't always enough for community projects to be comfortable standing up and fighting against well funded harassment.
I do think the lack of merit makes it significantly harder for WOTC to compel Larian into any nonsense like that though.