Games

16806 readers

986 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

PlayStation Will Use AI and Machine Learning to Speed up Game Development (insider-gaming.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/games@sh.itjust.works

34 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a new Sony Corporate Report, Sony has revealed that PlayStation will use AI and machine learning to speed up its game development.

On page 16 of the report, Sony had that “bolstering technologies that can help creators engage in maximizing the value of their IP in efficient, high-quality ways, including sensing and capturing as well as real-time 3D processing, AI, and machine learning,” and that these technologies will help to deliver its IP “rapidly and at low cost to a broader range of fans.”

The report reveals that PlayStation used machine learning in the production of Marvel’s Spider-Man 2 by applying voice-recognition software in certain languages. This process allowed the company to automatically synchronize subtitles with each character’s lines to “significantly shortening the subtitling process.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s constantly proving to be a massive disappointment, at least in the hands of capitalists.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You haven't used Cursor yet, have you?

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 2 points 1 month ago

Never used that one but I use Copilot daily and have tried similar. Copilot has gotten considerably worse since I started using it (I think because they mixed in ChatGPT results), so I rely on it very little.

These tools make people too dependent upon them, similar to how a lot of us can no longer navigate without map software. It feels like I’m slowly building my own coffin the more I use AI to write my code.

Aside from that, when you start to dig into the energy and water consumption required to run these things, it’s kind of insane.

[–] edward_jazzhands@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah but that's only because business people usually have zero knowledge of science or technology in any way. They know as much about what AI actually does as your grandma. It's going to take years before AI is ready to start really replacing workers in anything. But that doesn't stop the hype train from trying to convince everyone its right around the corner.

[–] orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts 1 points 1 month ago

But the point is that it shouldn’t replace people. I’ve been a programmer for 20+ years and there’s nothing that will make me want to work with tools I know can eventually replace me or someone else. Aside from that, the energy usage is getting batshit insane while we’re all in the midst of a climate crisis.