this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
563 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3168 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Probably being paranoid, but it seems to me like one of the few untapped utilities of this much cheap storage is just increased surveillance. Hi resolution recording of everything, all the time.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Not really? Storage isn't really much of a limiter, tape drives are huge. High res is more about the camera AFAIK, high res but low refresh rate(frame rate?) probably doesn't have much of a transfer speed issue to necessitate SSD speeds.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you want to search and index it, you don't want to do that on tapes. It's doable, but difficult. And what benefits tapes gain in reliability/long term storage, a RAID system would negate. Cheaper large SSDs make these kinds of systems more economical to the average person.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Right! Forgot about that aspect of Tape drives. Haven't messed with them before personally, so TIL 😁

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)