Games

16888 readers

381 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

369

Bethesda honcho says Starfield is 'the best game we've ever made' in massive bout of amnesia (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 109 points 2 months ago (6 children)

"This is, of course, a slightly wild thing for the studio that made Morrowind (its actual best game) and Skyrim (its most popular game by miles) to say"

Accurate

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Fallout 3 deserves a mention as a third most relevant.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is new Vegas the same as FO 3? NV was better imo

[–] MonkeyDatabase@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bethesda didn't do NV

[–] And009@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago

I bet Bethesda gets a lotta free credit there.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

FO3 did some thing much better than NV. NV is the best written, by far, but it's different, not better, for gameplay. FO3 was closer to the original games in gameplay. There were a lot more random events while traveling, and they could react with each other in really unique ways. NV essentially removed this. There are a lot of other areas of difference too, but NV always gets remembered as better, and I think that's largely because the things FO3 did better are systemic, so less noticeable, while NV had better stories, which you have to notice.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I always get lost in the randomness of Bethesda. NV was the only one with a storyline I could recall tbh.

Don't know if I actually finished vanilla Skyrim

load more comments (2 replies)