this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
272 points (96.9% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
272
Seasoned RPG devs from Obsidian and Bioware blame the temporary death of the isometric CRPG on 'vibes-based forecasting' from retailers (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/games@sh.itjust.works
89 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"I can't stress enough how often I'd hear a retail rep declare a genre/style/look was dead with zero supporting data."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Did you know that EA lost the FIFA license? FIFA decided that they wanted the whole cake so they’ve taken to developing the future FIFA games themselves.

EA is obviously continuing to develop their golden cow, now called EA Sports FC.

[–] Lath@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No, I didn't. Huh. Still, golden cow is right. Because what it produces is still a pile of manure.

[–] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Considering the way they responded to ESPN football back when I was younger, I cheer on every time I hear bad things about EA Sports.

For those too young or who don't recall... ESPN (or I should say, a company who licensed ESPN) came out with a budget football game 2000ish. They charged $20 for it, and it blew that year's Madden game out of the water in terms of quality and reviews. It was situated to force the industry to pivot from AAA to lovingly-crafted AA titles by teams that clearly cared about the product being fun.

So EA gave the NFL a metric fuckton of money for exclusivity to murder the competition.

The end.

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Huh. I was wondering about the name change when I bought FC 24 for my nephew this xmas. He made it very clear that they had changed names so that I didnt buy the wrong one, but he didnt say why it had changed. 🤯

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Yep, that’s why! I’m guessing he was clear because he wanted the newest version of the same game. No idea if the official game is any good or not. Could be it’s a complete disaster.