Technology

59534 readers

3195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

529

Winamp deletes entire GitHub source code repo after a rocky few weeks (arstechnica.com)

submitted 1 month ago by Xatolos@reddthat.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

However, wanting contributions while retaining the exclusive right to distribute the software is anti-collaborative. I’m reluctant to say it might as well be proprietary again

As you describe it, that is proprietary -- no "might as well be" qualification necessary. Just because you can read the source code doesn't make it Open Source; you've got to have all Four Freedoms for it to count.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

the users have the freedom to run, copy, distribute, study, change and improve the software.

Is it not actually four or are they counting some of these as the same thing?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 1 month ago

Change and improve sounds pretty much the same to me, as in the process is modifying it, only the intent changes.