this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
141 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3209 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The architecture being open source or not has nothing to do with security. All high performance risc-v cpu designs are proprietary. The instruction set itself is open source, but beyond that you have as much visibility into the internals of the processor as you would with an Intel one. The only thing the license impacts is that you can legally make your own risc-v processor if you want, whereas tou can’t make your own x86 processor if you want (legally).

[–] demesisx@infosec.pub 16 points 1 month ago

Thanks for setting me straight. I’ll still be pushing the idea of RISC-V.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can an end-user request the source for a commercial RISC-V processor or is that just a licensing issue?

[–] bamboo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

You can request it but no manufacturer is going to give it to you, nor would they have any obligation to.