Selfhosted

40296 readers

185 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.world

HybridSarcasm@lemmy.hybridsarcasm.xyz

Why docker (feddit.it)

submitted 10 months ago by Shimitar@feddit.it to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

80 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi! Question in the title.

I get that its super easy to setup. But its really worthwhile to have something that:

runs everything as root (not many well built images with proper useranagement it seems)
you cannot really know which stuff is in the images: you must trust who built it
lots of mess in the system (mounts, fake networks, rules...)

I always host on bare metal when I can, but sometimes (immich, I look at you!) Seems almost impossible.

I get docker in a work environment, but on self hosted? Is it really worth while? I would like to hear your opinions fellow hosters.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, "it's easier to use" is a pretty good quality to have. People tend to pick the most user-friendly and time-saving solution, should we really be surprised? On the contrary, I think FOSS should strive to be easier to use.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, “it’s easier to use” is a pretty good quality to have. People tend to pick the most user-friendly and time-saving solution

And they don't consider anything else and they they get themselves into CentOS situations. Or large monopolies like what Microsoft has over Office.

I think FOSS should strive to be easier to use.

Yes so do I.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 10 months ago

And they don't consider anything else and they they get themselves into CentOS situations. Or large monopolies like what Microsoft has over Office.

But so what? The kind of people who do this were not going to be grand contributors to FOSS anyway. They're just consumers, not makers, and they consume the products that make the most sense to them.

Also, let's not lay everything solely on consumer stupidity. Microsoft spends a crapton of money lobbying governments, administrations, universities, schools and so on around the world to maintain their monopoly. Corruption at all levels of society is a big factor.