this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
118 points (96.8% liked)

Linux

48328 readers
636 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz
118
Microsoft Engineer Sends Rust Linux Kernel Patches For In-Place Module Initialization (www.phoronix.com)
submitted 8 months ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 67 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The article is making a big deal that he works for Microsoft but also says he’s been doing this back since his days working at Google. It never says that this work is part of his official job at Microsoft, though, and I don’t know if we could even know that unless it’s part of his job title. Do we know that Microsoft hired him to do this or could it just be this has been his longtime passion project and he’s doing it outside of his work responsibilities, and he just happens to currently work for Microsoft as his day job?

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

If you browse the LKML (Linux Kernel Mailing List) for 5 minutes, you'll probably see a bunch of microsoft.com email addresses, and it's been that way for years. I understand why it bothers some people, but also Linus (and a couple others) approve everything that actually gets merged, whether it's from a microsoft employee, or a redhat employee, or anyone else. Even if microsoft wanted to pay employees to submit patches that would hurt the kernel, the chance that they'd actually be approved is so low it wouldn't be worth their time.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

To be clear, I wasn’t thinking Microsoft was sabotaging Linux; if they’re contributing officially I assume it’s because they’re also using it or want to increase adoption of something they’re creating by making it widely available.

[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I figured you were being genuine, but there's usually a few people who point at Microsoft's "embracing" of Linux as the first step in the "embrace, extend, extinguish" trope, and see any involvement by Microsoft as nefarious. When the reality is just that Microsoft's Azure cloud services are a much larger share of their annual revenue than Windows, and Linux is a major part of their cloud offerings.

[–] Secunergy@social.tchncs.de 1 points 8 months ago

@jqubed @MrMcGasion Microsoft uses Linux for it's Azure Cloud services and internally for building purposes

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Microsoft from what I can see seem to love Linux, with the advent of dotnet core, azure Linux, official Microsoft guide for installing Linux on your machine, wsl etc etc

It is slightly concerning but you have a good point of everything they contribute is vetted and I'm glad to have more time and money invested into its development

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Microsoft has been working with a number of open source projects for some time now. It shouldn't be that surprising anymore.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It ain't Steve Balmer's MS!

Developers, developers, developers, developers!

Edit: why not

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Yes, that’s why I thought this article was odd that they seem to be making a big deal out of it

[–] HumanPerson@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I agree that it is reasonable for them to work on it for fun, most companies, I'm guessing Microsoft too, make all code written by employees their IP which could be an issue.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

At least in the UK I was under the impression it's pretty illegal to try to claim anything employees do out of work time as company property

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I know that in my particular field (offensive cybersecurity) many, if not most, places that I’ve heard of, will carve out allowances for personal projects to remain yours. Some companies will even be fine with you setting aside a portion of your time each week to dedicate to developing and maintaining your own open source community tooling or contributing to projects you use regularly, without that whole “your ideas are our IP” thing. With that said, these are all smaller shops that are competing to hire hyper-specialized talent in an industry that until recently wasn’t as overrun with people as the development space is, so maybe none of this is applicable to a place like MS, I don’t really know.