Technology

59534 readers

3199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

341

‘IRL Fakes:’ Where People Pay for AI-Generated Porn of Normal People (www.404media.co)

submitted 7 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

193 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A Telegram user who advertises their services on Twitter will create an AI-generated pornographic image of anyone in the world for as little as $10 if users send them pictures of that person. Like many other Telegram communities and users producing nonconsensual AI-generated sexual images, this user creates fake nude images of celebrities, including images of minors in swimsuits, but is particularly notable because it plainly and openly shows one of the most severe harms of generative AI tools: easily creating nonconsensual pornography of ordinary people.

(page 2) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] OozingPositron@feddit.cl 8 points 7 months ago

You don't even need to pay, some people do it for free on /b/

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's stuff like this that makes me against copyright laws. To me it is clear and obvious that you own your own image, and it is far less obvious to me that a company can own an image whose creator drew multiple decades ago that everyone can identify. And yet one is protected and the other isn't.

What the hell do you own if not yourself? How come a corporation has more rights than we do?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This stuff should be defamation, full stop. There would need to be a law specifically saying you can't sign it away, though.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments