It's almost like a 100 page website TOS is meaningless.
this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
335 points (95.6% liked)
Technology
59589 readers
2838 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
The crux of it is
'If X owned the data, it could perhaps argue it has exclusive rights to control the data, but then it wouldn't have safe harbor.' if you own it you don't get section 230 protection.
This judge is also the one who stomped Oracle, in Oracle vs Google
Interesting, didn’t know that about the judge! Or maybe I just skimmed that part of the article lol
As if a judge’s ruling ever mattered to musk
The cunt
Technically it is a "Judge says" post, but they still made it look like one of the old "Elon says" posts
Simon says
Musk gotta cut back on that weed, or whatever he is smoking
His drug of choice is ketamine. Fuck me, why do I know that?
He doesn't exactly keep that fact a secret...
Sure… but why do I just know that? He’s just some random ass celeb. Why is that fact stored in my memory?
I wouldn't even grace him with "celeb" - you only know anything about Musk because he's a gigantic aloof piece of shit lol
I LITERALLY only know Elon is because of the media, and the fact he pops up on X all the time, to every user I assume.
Haha