this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
67 points (94.7% liked)

Games

16796 readers
850 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Marvel Rivals is the game of the century. It's depth is amazing. The controls are flawless. The graphics are mind blowing. It's not worth waiting on, you should pre-order it today and buy all the expansion packs. I'm definitely not saying this because of legal obligation or threats against my dog. Please buy this game now, there's no time.

[–] Skelectus@suppo.fi 5 points 6 months ago

Satire detected. Please stand by, your dog will be killed shortly.

[–] cyr0catdrag0nz@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 months ago

I'm not a lawyer, but sounds like you can and should disparage the contract as much as you like. Shit is laughable they must've made such a bad game...

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It's not disparaging to say "I would not buy this game" :)

[–] illi@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That would be the public statement which is detrimental to the reputation of the game

[–] AnIntenseMoist@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Actually, that would fall under the "or provide subjective negative reviews of the game". Because reviewers are only allowed to have an opinion if it's positive.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

Why not both? Twice the breach for price of one statement!