this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
81 points (90.1% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
4225 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

IMHO, the ScarJo voice was the least weird part. The weirdest part was the intense horny energy that they trained into the model. It’s like they trained it on the first 5 minutes of every girlfriend role play video on porn hub.

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I don't agree she or any of the voices sounded horny to be honest. But they sounded overly movie / voice actor like / emotional. People do not speak like this in every day basis.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Knowing OpenAI, they probably did just rip off her voice.

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Knowing every single Ai company probably

[–] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I feel kinda bad for the voice actor they used. Her voice was (potentially) going to be famous as the "AI" voice (similar to Siri), and instead that won't happen because she happens to sound like Scarlet Johanson.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

it would be a good PR move if they released a statement from the actress who trained it and had some agreement with them. otherwise i'll continue to believe they owe Scarlett a royalty.

[–] lorkano@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Might be too late for it to make any meaningful change, now everyone already says it's Scarlett

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 8 points 6 months ago

My initial reaction to the announcement clips was that of disgust.

Like auditory uncanny valley. The result is impressive, but holy fuck hearing it speak makes me cringe, I want to shut it up asap.

Unplug it before it can ask if I want to kill myself, as if it actually cares, and isn't a million coin tosses away from acting on some random training data to encourage me to do it instead of not.

To interact with humans with such sycophancy, I am viscerally creeped out imagining the design objectives.

The worst part is, it's being presented with the same false confidence that LLMs themselves exhibit... Even as they confidently explain how simple it is to prove the earth is flat when you ask.

Fucking hell, the tech is amazing, but can we not handwave away the limitations and irresponsibly apply it to literally everything, as if just a few more yottabytes of training data means it'll stop making mistakes "aaaany second now".

[–] uzay@infosec.pub 6 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised with how obsessed they are with recreating the movie Her