this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
65 points (95.8% liked)

Games

16812 readers
300 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago

“More profitable” != “More revenue” as adjusted for inflation. It may mean they have higher mark ups which is netting them more profit on things.

[–] hal_5700X@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Are they adding the PC releases to the total?

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

More than the PS2 really? That's impressive

[–] simple@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah, there are way more gamers now than there were 20 years ago. If anything it would be abnormal if the newest generation isn't as profitable as previous generations.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If anything it would be abnormal if the newest generation isn't as profitable as previous generations.

Its a little more hit and miss than that.

If we take total software sales as a proxy for profitably:

  • nes > snes > n64 > gamecube < wii > wii u < switch
  • master system < megadrive > saturn > dreamcast
  • ps1 < ps2 > ps3 < ps4
  • xbox < 360 > one

This shows 8 consoles thare were less successful than their predecessor vs 6 that were more successful.

https://vgsales.fandom.com/wiki/Software_tie_ratio

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 months ago

the advantage the PS4 and PS5 had was the physical console sold at a loss in a shorter time window.

the PS2 had to push the DVD format to be mainstream, and the PS3 pushing the Bluray format as mainstream (the PS3 was effectively the cheapest bluray player on launch), while both devices retaining backwards compatibility initially by including the previous generations cpu.

also having the market move to digital saves a lot of cost on logistics and pumping out physical copies.

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah, a lot of budget gamers joined the market since the Pandemic.

[–] Kelly@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

For the first four years the total spend per ps4 console is given as $580, for the ps5 this figure is $731.

This is equivalent to 3.4% growth year over year but if you allow for inflation it is significantly less impressive.