Or, perhaps, consider another distro.
this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
56 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
48328 readers
636 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Man... At this point we really should actively be telling people to stay the hell away from Ubuntu. This is some M$Windows levels of sneaky and borderline malicious behavior.
Ubuntu/Canonical is the Microsoft of Linux distros. It's no surprise they were the choice for WSL.
Ubuntu has been forcing decisions on users and embedding advertisements for a long time.
Examples that immediately come to mind...
- When that Amazon search was embedded into the app launcher search.
- These sorts of self promotions.
- Quietly installing snaps instead of debs when using
apt install
We are tho, like basically every thread about Linux has at least one comment warning people.
How do I get rid of it.
Reinstall Debian... Problem solved, and you get rid of snap as a bonus!
This is the best answer.
There is literally not a single useful comment here.
You have packages from outside the official main repo, in the universe repo.
You are using a stable Distribution so packages are frozen and need backported security updates.
You dont get them for the optional universe repos, but if you give them a bit of money (or afaik Ubuntu pro is even free for a few devices) then they will also support these 3rd party packages.
It is an optional service, they warn you that you use outdated packages, and offer a solution.
I dont use Ubuntu and Snaps are crap, but this is totally fine.
Thank you for some much needed background information (and perhaps even some of Ubuntu's justification)!
There is literally not a single useful comment here.
That's a bit harsh 😜. Though, I agree the 'f*ck-Ubuntu'-circlejerk is very present.
It is an optional service, they warn you that you use outdated packages, and offer a solution.
I guess it's wishful thinking to argue that they should have included the security patches from the get-go.
they should have included the security patches from the get-go
I dont know how Ubuntu does that stuff, but universe is community supported only. It is required for many normal packages, so yes you could say their service is not good enough but hey, its free Software.
If you dont pay a cent you have like nothing to complain
I'm very unfamiliar with Ubuntu, so I apologize for my ignorance. Is universe their AUR, COPR, OBS? I thought that PPAs were Ubuntu's user repository.
This is what I dont understand too. No, it is for regular packages, not random 3rd party stuff.
Those are made on Launchpad and available as PPAs, originally meant to be the first step, followed by having them approved to Ubuntus repos.
So, would it be fair to say that their packages suck and they're desperately fundraising money through ads in hopes of fixing it?
No. You are using a stable Distro. This is how stable distros work.
If you want upstream updates for all packages, use a rolling or semi-rolling release like Fedora, Arch, OpenSUSE, Gentoo, etc.
But Debian does get security updates backported, right? Like, is Ubuntu actively preventing you from getting these?
I dont know how many packages they share but this seems very unrealistic.
Debian and Ubuntu have different release schedukes and package versions.
True. But Debian Testing and Unstable do exist. Which should be primary candidates for where Ubuntu gets their packages.
If you dont pay a cent you have like nothing to complain
Disagree. Trojans are totally free, and I feel I have plenty to complain about there.
What Desktop do you use with your Trojan?
Wow that's a real douche maneuver
sudo apt remove ubuntu-advantage-tools
package ubuntu-advantage-tools is not installed, so not removed.
I can however remove ubuntu-advantage-desktop-daemon, together with apturl: common and apturl software-properties-gtk.
Should I?
Ah - that's all I had to do to solve it on Ubuntu server 22.04. Maybe desktop is different, maybe 24.04 is different. You can try removing additional packages or following other instructions. I won't post any links here, as I see different possible solutions and haven't tried any other than the one above. Let us know what works.
Ubuntu never advertised itself so blatantly.
Canonical advertising their products has been a thing on Ubuntu server motd for years
Eww that's kinda icky
iirc it's from ubuntu-advantage-tools - you can remove it, but it's set as a dependent for something important (ubuntu-minimal?) which makes it really annoying. I don't use ubuntu anymore so hopefully someone who knows more will stop by.
because you chose canonical over debian.
give stock debian a try
Yeah. I finally switched and learned that what I loved about Ubuntu exists in Debian, without the extra nonsense.
As someone who stopped using Ubuntu since 2016 due to Canonical's bullshit, what's this "Ubuntu Pro" nonsense? Is there some premium track or something? If so, that's disgusting and I hate it.
It's extended security updates
What do you mean? As in security updates for old versions that are otherwise completely unsupported? As in, for enterprise users?