this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
158 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12344 readers
491 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 48 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It’s like every time he opens his mouth nowadays he somehow comes off as even more of an imbecile.

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I just mean that he’s had an amusing number of these headdesk moments in the very recent past

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Oh yeah agree, he has the reverse Midas touch at the mo. Might add it coincided with the media flipping sides when they saw it was a foregone conclusion.

[–] gasgiant@lemmy.ml 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

His parents were a GP and owned a pharmacy. They just didn't get it for him/them for whatever reason.

They certainly could have afforded it if they wanted to.

There's a massive difference between just not having something as a child and not even being able to afford it at all.

I love these Tory twat stories where they try to relate to normal people. They're so far off the mark it highlights just how clueless they are about real life.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

Sky wasn't even launched until he was 9. So a big chunk of his childhood it wouldn't have even been possible to get sky.

[–] br3d@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Loads of people - probably most people - didn't have Sky. When did shoveling cash at Murdoch become some sort of minimum entry level for society? Not having a TV would be vaguely interesting, but not having Sky means nothing

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 5 months ago

How much could a banana cost? 10 dollars?

[–] Redacted@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

One of the admittedly minor things I dislike about his tetchy interview answers is when he starts going "blah blah blah...that's why we've done things such as..." and then proceeds to list the one and only example of said thing.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I spent a few years in England as a kid (I'm from the U.S.) when they only had 4 channels, two of which were boring (to a kid) BBC shit. That was a hardship. Having nothing at all would have been preferable because I wouldn't have wasted so many hours flipping between 4 fucking channels hoping for something, anything interesting to watch. I usually found it more fun to play with the teletext thing they had, but there wasn't anything interesting on that either.