this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2024
745 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3143 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] egeres@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Interestingly enough, even if it would make sense that boeing is now fully focusing on improving quality, it also makes sense to me that airbus must be ensuring and pushing a lot of quality upgrades as well, it would be perfect marketing for them if no mistakes whatsoever happened on airbus's planes

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

And if they didn't develop the culture of sweeping safety issues under the rug at all levels, they won't have much trouble keeping ahead because I'm sure that even at the height of Boeing's safety ignoring, I bet most of the communication still looked like they took safety seriously. Just those in the know realized that they could make themselves look better by faking it and their management wouldn't care. I've gotta assume that some number of them will think the current safety culture overhaul is really trying to send a message of "just be smarter about ignoring safety, don't let it get to the point where doors fall off mid-flight and we need to kill some whistleblowers".

[–] downpunxx@fedia.io 6 points 5 months ago

thalidomide sales took a real header once too. people normally will choose to spend their money on things which will benefit them, and tend not to spend money on the things which will kill them and hurt their business.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 months ago

Well, keep buying back stock, that seems to help.

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It’s good to see the free market actually working

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 5 months ago

Millennials are killing the 737 Max industry!

[–] Bookmeat@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

s/tumble/crater/

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Don't they make a shitload of weapons though? They could probably never make another commercial airliner again and still do just fine.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 5 months ago

The military and civilian divisions will be separate though. .

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The results released Tuesday compared unfavorably with Europe’s Airbus, which reported net orders for 15 planes in May — 27 sales but 12 cancellations.

Boeing also saw Aerolineas Argentinas cancel an order for a single Max jet, bringing its net sales for the month to three.

The dismal results followed poor figures for April, when Boeing reported seven sales — none of them for the Max.

Boeing hopes that the slow pace of orders reflects a lull in sales before next month’s Farnborough International Airshow, where aircraft deals are often announced.

But the Federal Aviation Administration is capping Boeing’s production of 737s after a door plug blew out from an Alaska Airlines Max, allegations by whistleblowers that Boeing has taken shortcuts to produce planes more quickly, and reports of falsified inspection records on some 787 Dreamliner jets.

Boeing, based in Arlington, Virginia, delivered 24 jetliners in May, including 19 Max jets.


The original article contains 237 words, the summary contains 151 words. Saved 36%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›