this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
-8 points (44.9% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3135 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago
[–] floridaman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 4 months ago

The same Zuck that is training "AI" off their platform's user data?

[–] maxinstuff@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think Zuck is right about this, insofar as the comments in the article are concerned.

OpenAI have done a brilliant job of selling the dream - but there will not be one "god model," - there will be many specialised, smaller models.

You can already see it going that way with new hardware shipping with NPU's. These workloads are expensive to run and shipping them to your device is a top priority.

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

ChatGpt already is multiple smaller models. Most guesses peg chatgpt4 as a 8x220 Billion parameter mixture of experts, or 8 220 billion parameter models squished together

[–] small44@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Wasn't he trying to do thst with the metaverse?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Says the closed source everything else company?

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

simply not true. they’re no angels or open source champions, but come on.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

Yeah yeah I know, its just too easy to shit on Facebook/Zucc.

He probably just doesn't want a competitor to the lizard people overlords /s.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago

This is worse than it sounds since Zuck worships a genocidal god.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean, you can probably create something akin to a god, but I don't see as to whether it being open source or not would change that.

[–] kenkenken@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 months ago

Oh, but so many people in the world identify themselves as religious. Why they do not want to see an artificial God?