this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
207 points (99.5% liked)

Not The Onion

17350 readers
1123 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/23992689

Archive/mirror: https://archive.ph/zoBGi

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

The woman is reportedly denying the charges saying during voluntary questioning that she was not aware that the suitcase is a vehicle that requires a driver's license.

When you start to realize that there could be too many laws on the books.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The audacity of that woman!

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems to be really well thought out. Like the original meme is nice too:

img

But would be a lot of paint that would flake off easily so the above design looks like it would work much better for a shirt:-).

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bring back 1970s iron-ons!

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And clothing that lasts for ~~more than~~ at least one year, sheesh!

But were people allowed to say "bitch" back then? Truly we have advanced in so many ways!:-)

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The best is not having to dress up for work. I had a couple of years of that and then transitioned to jeans/sweats/shorts and t-shirt for the past 35 years. That sucked and thank goodness pantyhose is or less gone.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And now many people work from home, in like pajamas or equivalent. Personal toilet, snacks, that's the life! :-)

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Shorts and tshirt are pajamas and day clothes.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still feel funny about calling my female dog a bitch. But not when I call a person a bitch. I use it most in phrases like "they're just going to bitch about it"

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it probably depends on the person and whether they would be okay with it or not? Like is it silly such as "Bish pulease", whereas I've never once heard someone call someone else like a "cunt" (UK, and I guess Australia?) and had it be any kind of okay. But rap culture seems to have redeemed bitch... maybe, for some people?

Edit: as always, it's the consent that makes all the difference.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah definitely not. I’d have been grounded for weeks even in the 80s.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is when you would respond "Bitch, I said what I said" (Doja Cat, Paint the Town Red), right?! Hrmm.... me neither:-P.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was on the tail end of kids still getting spanked or worse (last of the gen Xers).

My cousins still had a paddle with holes in it that made a terrible whistling sound before it got you. Their dad was a southerner though was always the excuse.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

Nowadays kids parent the previous generation so I'm not entirely certain that things are "better". Probably yes in some ways, worse in others:-|.

[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Carrying on on her carry on, like a carrion.

It has a max speed of 13 kph, that's practically crawling. And she was on a sidewalk. This is just much ado about nothing

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not really a suit case though. That's a foldable bike.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I guess you are right, my bad. Still the commercial for it is hilarious.

[–] sickhack@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[–] hark@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is the purest form of battery-on-wheels I can imagine and I find this highly amusing.

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except the one Marques has can go 15mph, or about 24kph, almost twice that of the one in the article.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Smh that's clearly a class 0.5 ebike and drivers just need to share the road /s

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Since wind does riding an ebike require a license?

If it can accelerate without pedal-assist, it's not an ebike in many jurisdictions, likely including Japan.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

Japan might not have a category for e-bikes. The article says the suitcase was considered a motorbike.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Since legislators realized that mopeds had been invented.