this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17653797

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Why though? The main benefit of solid state is the energy density, which is not at all important for a stationary, grid-connected system. It's also super expensive. Why not just stick with sodium-ion batteries for the grid which are way cheaper per kWh?

[–] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

China is doing so many big things with their power infrastructure recently, they're obviously very keen to get away from oil

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

I like that its green, but is really more strategic on their part. China has just a small fraction of domestic petroleum production of other countries like the USA or Russia. This means China is vulnerable to other countries that they depend on for petroleum imports to feed their people and produce economically.

Every effort to shift energy production (and storage) to domestic ways means less dependence on other nation's energy exports.

[–] devilish666@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sadly we can't buy that things yet for home or office bc it's still expensive