this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59589 readers
3300 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Poggervania@kbin.social -1 points 11 months ago

It’s funny how some of Elongated Muskrat’s testing and experiments involve the subjects dying.

Monkeys dying with the Neuralink experiments, and humans are dying with these autopilot tests!

[–] rsuri@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Random question I've always wondered about in case anyone is more familiar with these systems than me. My understanding is that autopilot relies on optical sensors exclusively. And image recognition tends to rely on getting loads of data to recognize particular objects. But what if there's an object not in the training data, like a boulder in a weird shape? Can autopilot tell anything is there at all?