this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
786 points (96.7% liked)

Memes

45726 readers
882 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Confuse AI? Fuck, I'm confused...wait...OMG....am I AI?!?!

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 35 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Absolutely human, i even removed the context text and it didn’t even flinch.

gpt

[–] Bluetooth@feddit.dk 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

"Similar color" yep seems right, "...and texture" wait what?

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

idk what kind of muffin they are feeding this AI but sure is a hairy one

[–] EvolvedTurtle@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Wow, that's a little too impressive. I'm guessing that image was probably in its training set (or each individual image). There are open training sets with adversarial images, and these images may have come from them. Every time I've tried to use ChatGPT with images it has kinda failed (on electronic schematics, plant classification, images of complex math equations, etc). I'm kind of surprised OpenAI doesn't just offload some tasks to purpose-built models (an OCR or a classification model like inaturalist's would've performed better in some of my tests).

[–] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 10 months ago

This exact image (without the caption-header of course) was on one of the slides for one of the machine-learning related courses at my college, so I assume it's definitely out there somewhere and also was likely part of the training sets used by OpenAI. Also, the image in those slides has a different watermark at the bottom left, so it's fair to assume it's made its rounds.

Contradictory to this post, it was used as an example for a problem that machine learning can solve far better than any algorithms humans would come up with.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 16 points 11 months ago

Just take a bite out of each. You know you got the right one when its starts yelping.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Did people make you? If so, yes!

[–] match@pawb.social 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

wow!! such pretty orange houseplants

[–] offendicula@fedia.io 5 points 11 months ago

Ah yes, I grow these orange houseplants every year. Visitors definitely admire this species of lovely orange houseplant 😉

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 28 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Hot take: AI good. Every mentioned problem with AI actually stems from capitalism.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I do agree on the whole, It's the next phase of automation. The real problem stems from the fact that we hold onto the system where a tiny handful of people get the full benefit of the productivity, while the others are paid in time incriments which value goes down with demand, so as more jobs are automated or assisted (to allow more work with less people), supply demand devalues the labor.

[–] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

This is why I support worker ownership and cooperatives rather than corporate ownership. I think we need to shift towards a Mutualist economy rather than a Capitalist one.

[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No. It stems from closed source software. True, however, that stems from capitalism. Without that we'd be good friends with AI and fix all the obvious problems we caused. Then do like Bill Hicks said and explore space.

[–] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago (20 children)

Open source AI can still be problematic under capitalism. It can still be developed to disproportionally favor the ruling class and used to disproportionally benefit them

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm so proud of u my friend

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yep, it's always the fault of the people using it for bad deeds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I agree with you and don't forget that Capitalism shouldn't be reformed as Social Democracy claims but it must be destroyed from head to toes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tory@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately, AI is quickly becoming better at this kind of thing than average humans are. And the internet is doomed for sure as a result.

We're gonna be swimming in a sea of AI generated, convincing half truths and lies.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I like the way one of those pictures is of a slightly deformed dog. Figure THESE out, AI!

(No please don't. We don't want AI to figure out any more than it already has.)

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I only see deformed dogs in the non-muffin ones.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 6 points 11 months ago

Are you sure those aren't the muffins? :P

[–] blanketswithsmallpox@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

That's because shitty people love their dogs deformed, unable to breathe, and with high vet bills. They think it's cute or purebred.

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You can hear some dogs having trouble to breathe. How can people like something like that? Disgusting.

[–] Ultragramps@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

12 is definitely abnormally shaped.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

yup thatsa the one ima talkin about

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure gpt4 can do this

[–] kewko@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Yep, 0 errors. Couldn't find a video I saw

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I hope each of them is named muffin

[–] mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

"Technology bad! Oh no muh manual labor job!" -everyone throughout history

AI isn't the issue, it's the fact that we don't have any kind of system set up to handle the eventual takeover of the economy by robotics and AI.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 10 months ago

I don't! I want people who are concerned about the misuse of AI, particularly by corporations and world governments, to learn how to use AI to fight back against our oppressors or at least make AI-powered technologies that are helpful for common people, and to archive how it works, particularly how it fails.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The cylons won't take kindly to this...

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Or the next Google CAPTCHA after one of the sneaker-scalpers trains their own.

[–] AltheaHunter@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

Mmmm blueberry muffins...

[–] Utter_Karate@hexbear.net 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Click all the images containing something sweet.

[–] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 4 points 10 months ago

All of them.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 points 10 months ago
[–] SapphironZA@lemmings.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] Funkytom467@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Is that the real war on AI?

Human capitalists fighting for their profit VS other Humans that fight for some rights of theirs.

The age of digital war is really settling in now that even protesting is something we do with digital tool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] occhionaut@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

is it worth it?

[–] Un4@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Tried it on chat gpt 4, here what it thinks:

This image is a collage that alternates between photos of Chihuahuas and blueberry muffins. The arrangement is such that it plays on the visual similarities between the two, with the muffins and parts of the Chihuahuas (likely their faces) mimicking each other in color and texture. This creates a humorous effect, as it can be initially challenging to differentiate between the muffins and the dogs.

Starting from the top left corner and moving left to right, row by row:

  1. Blueberry muffin with spots resembling a dog's eyes and nose.
  2. Face of a Chihuahua with a similar coloration to the muffin.
  3. Blueberry muffin resembling the face of a Chihuahua.
  4. Chihuahua face with a light fur color matching the muffin's surface.
  5. Chihuahua face with dark eyes and nose similar to blueberry spots.
  6. Muffin with a pattern that resembles a Chihuahua's facial features.
  7. Chihuahua with an expression and coloring that echoes the appearance of a muffin.
  8. Muffin with blueberries and coloring that looks like a Chihuahua's face.
  9. Chihuahua with a facial expression and fur colors that mimic a muffin's texture.
  10. Muffin with blueberries mimicking the eyes and nose of a Chihuahua.
  11. Chihuahua with features that resemble the spots on a muffin.
  12. Muffin resembling a Chihuahua's face in color and texture.
  13. Close-up of a Chihuahua's face with colors similar to a blueberry muffin.
  14. Muffin with a pattern of blueberries resembling a Chihuahua's face.
  15. Chihuahua looking directly at the camera, with fur colors like a muffin.
  16. Two Chihuahuas close together, with their heads resembling muffin tops.
[–] Un4@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Conclusion it sometimes gets fooled :)

[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's likely seen the image before. Try randomising the image, reversing some of them, altering the gamma, and adding some noise. See how it does then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blandfordforever@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

My favorite new captcha

load more comments
view more: next ›