Technology

59963 readers

3495 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Has the AOSP project failed consumers? (www.xda-developers.com)

submitted 4 months ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/17508868

When Google, along with a consortium of other companies, announced the open-source operating system we call Android way back in 2007, the world was paying attention. The iPhone had launched the same year, and the entire mobile space was wary of the rush of excitement around the admittedly revolutionary device. AOSP (Android Open Source Project) was born, and within a few years Android swallowed up market share with phones of all shapes and sizes from manufacturers all over the globe. Android eventually found its way into TVs, fridges, washing machines, cars, and the in-flight entertainment system of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 76 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

AOSP is basically unusable by itself now.

Ancient applications that were abandoned long ago, hardware incompatibility, outdated drivers, lots of stuff from shifted to Play Services that are missing or borked in AOSP now, etc.

Shit, most of the time notifications don't even work.

Google got what they wanted from AOSP. They bought it, they got everyone onto it. And then they started killing it and shifting everybody to use play services and be more beholden to Google. You can never trust big tech.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 31 points 4 months ago

Typical EEE, yes.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We still do have custom versions of AOSP, such as lineage OS and graphene OS. However, with the difficulty to install them, most people will choose not to, but the people who really want their privacy and open source will go through the hassle of installing them.

[–] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

graphene OS. However, with the difficulty to install them, most people will choose not to

GrapheneOS is ridiculously simple.to install. EnableOEM unlocking, boot to fastboot, connect to PC. Then you press four buttons (wait for the buttons to say they're done) on a browser. Super simple.

Granted, it's harder than picking up your phone and using the OEM install, but that doesn't make GrapheneOS difficult to install. The days of using exploits, flashing a custom recovery, flashing a zip, then flashing another for Gapps, maybe one for a kernel, etc...those days are over if you're using a Pixel with GrapheneOS.

https://grapheneos.org/install/web

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Since this innuendo keeps getting reposted, it's worth restating:

AOSP has been and still is a resounding success for everyone.

Perhaps insufficient experience with the pre-AOSP status quo might be clouding the author's judgement.

[–] erwan@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

When AOSP was first released, it included all necessary app. Now many of them have been replaced by Google's proprietary app.

There is also the Play Services, necessary for many third party apps. I know an open source compatible lib exists, but it's not the same as not needing it at all.

Yes you can use a fully Open Source Android system, but it's getting farer and farer from a "standard" Android install with all the Google proprietary stuff.