this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
112 points (99.1% liked)

Games

16806 readers
1127 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 45 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Video games have, and always will be, a form of art. Even if you take an awful game made by a big company and pick it apart, you can find people passionate about what they do. People that want to share their ideas and expressions with the world. People that love working on games. People that are talented... People that give a shit.

If Leonardo da Vinci had to please stockholders instead of expressing himself, we'd have a thousand versions of the same painting instead of a collection of unique and individual paintings.

[–] JASN_DE@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If Leonardo da Vinci had to please stockholders instead of expressing himself, we'd have a thousand versions of the same painting instead of a collection of unique and individual paintings.

A lot of what we consider "works of art" have nevertheless been contract work though, i.e. work that has been explicitly ordered. That's not necessarily the same as having to please shareholders, but having to please clients can be quite tricky itself.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

But everyone that's an artist wants to make money from it. And contract work back then is more akin to an artist nowadays doing commissions. The problem with pleasing shareholders is that, in all honesty, they don't give a shit about the art. All they care about is profit. If money was the only goal of the clients, then Michelangelo (or whomever he worked for) would have never been commissioned to paint the Sistine Chapel. They would have just paid some schmuck to paint it grey or something to save on money.

Not trying to be confrontational, just trying to make my point more clear.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah Michelangelo has some great “fuck you” art. The man hated both frescoes and his boss

[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago

Oh come on… it took them THIS LONG to figure that out??? Stockholders milk the lactaid-acid out of Ubisoft since 2013.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago

That goes for all industries. The stock market is a casino that changes the course of your company for the worst.

Never go public. Never.