this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
2276 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3110 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 5opn0o30@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Starting in what versions?

[–] haywire7@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Forgive me if this is an overly simplistic view but if the ads with cookies are all served on Google's platform say then would all those ads have access to the Google cookie jar?

If they don't now then you can bet they are working on just that.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

So that's what third party cookies are. What this does is make it so that when you go to example.com and you get a Google cookie, that cookie is only associated with example.com, and your random.org Google cookie will be specific to that site.

A site will be able to use Google to track how you use their site, which is a fine and valid thing, but they or Google don't get to see how you use a different site. (Google doesn't actually share specifics, but they can see stuff like "behavior on one site led to sale on the other")

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We'll have to see what happens but what you are talking about is what Mozilla calls Third-Party Cookies and... they are aware of it.

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/third-party-cookies-firefox-tracking-protection#:~:text=Third%2Dparty%20cookies%20are%20cookies,considered%20a%20third%2Dparty%20cookie.

I can't entirely tell if that means they will be put in the facebook cookie jar or if it will be put in the TentaclePorn Dot Org (don't go there, it is probably a real site and probably horrifying) cookie jar. If the former? Then only facebook themselves have that which... is still a lot better I guess? If the latter then that is basically exactly what we all want but a lot of sites are gonna break (par for the course with Firefox but...).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm curious how this will affect OAuth (if at all). Does it use an offsite cookie to remember the session, or is that only created after it redirects back to the site that initiated the login?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MinusPi@pawb.social 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It baffles me that this was ever not the case.

[–] mbirth@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago

It was - in the ancient times. Then, there were 3rd party cookies which you had to manually approve upon the initial creation. And then it went all down south and got abused via CDNs and ad networks.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 7 points 2 months ago

Such a chad move. Respect!

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Take that, cookie monsters!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›