this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3209 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Please stahp the mergers and acquisitions already pleeeeease.

[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What makes you think that consolidation of markets isn't how the free market operates as it matures? As if the X86 market was any way competitive and healthy before when there are literally two companies sharing critical patents with each other and gatekeeping the competition out.

[–] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There are three, I think VIA still has a foot in the game. There were quite a few companies that clean roomed, licensed or extended the x86 platform back in the day. My first machine had a NEC V20 in it and I had 386 machines with AMD, Centaur, and VIA chips…

[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

be that as it may, my point still stands. Nobody is realistically getting into that market.

[–] TheWilliamist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Not disagreeing, just pointing out there is a third…

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

What makes you think the other commenter wants chip makers to operate in a free market?

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This can go exactly Two ways.

  1. The Us government says it is national interest to keep chip manufacturing owned by Americans.

  2. The Us government says we understand this will create a monopoly but we won’t stawp, due to the rise of Chinese chip manufacturing.

But make no mistake this is not intel’s or Qualcomm’s decision and it has nothing to do with what either company needs it is entirely up to the Us government.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 2 months ago

I don't see how 1 is relevant, since both Intel and Qualcomm are American companies

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My gut says this would kill x86_64 and by extension AMD. My kneejerk reaction is no way this would pass regulators (monopoly).

[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

AMD and Intel have already partnered on killing x64 in the longer run and work is under way.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] drdabbles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the instruction set and the implementation in hardware is absurd at this point.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The all new 2nm snapdragion!...inside.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Oh the Irony