this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
270 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59495 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The blocked resources in question? Automatic security and features updates and plugin/theme repository access. Matt Mullenweg reasserted his claim that this was a trademark issue. In tandem, WordPress.org updated its Trademark Policy page to forbid WP Engine specifically (way after the Cease & Desist): from "you are free to use ['WP'] n any way you see fit" to a diatribe:

The abbreviation “WP” is not covered by the WordPress trademarks, but please don’t use it in a way that confuses people. For example, many people think WP Engine is “WordPress Engine” and officially associated with WordPress, which it’s not. They have never once even donated to the WordPress Foundation, despite making billions of revenue on top of WordPress.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/26/wordpress-vs-wp-engine-drama-explained attempts to provide a full chronology so far.

Edit:

The WordPress Foundation, which owns the trademark, has also filed to trademark “Managed WordPress” and “Hosted WordPress.” Developers and providers are worried that if these trademarks are granted, they could be used against them.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 80 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Would it be wrong to hope they manage to commit some gross act of mutual destruction, and that the outcome would be that I never have to deal with Wordpress ever again?

[–] Pechente@feddit.org 29 points 1 month ago (5 children)

That would be great but the reality is that client’s mindsets need to change. I tried to explain to a client that Wordpress is not a good fit for their complex web application and yet they didn’t wanna switch to anything else. People are way too worried about new tech and wanna stick with whatever they know, even if it causes massive problems.

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wordpress is not a good fit for their complex web application

Seriously. People want to shove everything into Wordpress then get cranky when you can't make Wordpress into a ecommerce store, marketing platform, personal blog, file sharing service, and NFT marketplace.

And then it gets hacked because they needed 14 SEO plugins, 2 different form plugins, and were not going to pay for managed updates because that's easy they can do it themselves.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you're trying to turn WordPress into an application, for christs sake go use Django, Laravel, or Rails. Don't send a CMS to do an applications' job.

Shit you don't even need a CMS at this point. I moved off WordPress to Hugo and SFTP and i'm happier than a pig in shit. Shit loads fast and no external threats.

[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wordpress is the Excel of CMSs. It can do just about anything, but at this point it barely manages content well.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago

That's a great analogy actually. You can do almost anything with it but what the vast majority of people choose to do with it is wrong.

Just like how people insist on using Excel as a database or Excel as a form.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I haven't done web work for well over a decade and recently was surprised to learn that Wordpress is still very relevant. I remember back then, seeking alternatives as we expected it to become more of a legacy thing a few years down the track, so we were on the lookout for future-proofing client sites with a better foundation. At that point it was a decade old and annoying af because it morphed into a messy way of doing websites because people misused it's original purpose. Brain had to think like a blog and then trick it into doing what you want, kind of like using tables to structure pages before CSS-P saved the day.

[–] ignism@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

This year I stopped to let my clients pick the CMS. I tell them you wouldn’t ask a carpenter to make a chair, but restrict them to only use metal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I have off-and-on searched for alternative software for personal blogs that can be self-hosted and it doesn’t seem like there are many options anymore. The only ones I’ve seen are WriteFreely and FlatPress. Are there any other options you’re aware of?

Depends on if you need a CMS, or if you can use a static site generator.

For a CMS, I'm still a fan of Ghost and it has (mostly) not enshittified to the point it's unpleasant to use.

If you don't need the whole CMS thing, there's an awful lot of options. (And hosting them is super simplified since you can just stuff the output into a S3 bucket/Cloudflare Pages/Github Pages/a dozen other providers for basically free.)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Any suggestions for a free easy to use alternative to wp?

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 month ago

Wix was not free when I looked last, I cannot stand using websites that use Shopify.

I will look into some of those others.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, open source licenses don't entitle you to use trademarks.

This looks pretty bad to me.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 month ago (7 children)

WP Engine for WordPress.
That seems to be the commonly accepted solution if you look at other 3rd party trademark cases - situations like "RIF is fun for Reddit" coming to mind.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Like JohnEdwa said, using a trademark to refer to someone else's product is considered nominative fair use: "referencing a mark to identify the actual goods and services that the trademark holder identifies with the mark."

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago (13 children)

They're very obviously using the trademark in a manner that implies endorsement.

That is absolutely trademark infringement.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What does WP stand for then?

[–] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I must be old - it's WordPerfect to me.

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Exactly what I thought. I'd love to sit a young person today in front of that blank blue screen with the blinking cursor. Now, I have to go take my pills before bed.

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

WillPeoplenoticethecashgrab

[–] TwitchingCheese@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Wow Matt really looking bad on this one. This just reeks of trying to push out a major business competitor to wordpress.com and abusing control over wordpress.org to do it.

[–] NostraDavid@programming.dev 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

ThePrimeagen invited Matt to explain what's going on.

TL;DW Matt's claim is that he tried to get WP Engine to pay for a Trademark license (or whatever it's called - I'm recalling from watching yesterday), over several months, and they tried to legally block him in every way. Their self-claimed contributions to Wordpress were (as he tells it) that they held conferences where they promoted their own stuff only - code contributions have been minimal.

So the combination of not willing to pay for the trademark + not contributing back (not in code, not in helping the community) is Matt's reasoning for blocking them from using Wordpress' resources.

He also mentioned that he has good relations with other Wordpress hosts, so it's not like he's trying to block anyone else from hosting, but they were all willing to pay for the use of the Trademark (and/or contribute back).

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 month ago

This is accurate, but also, "minimal" here is 40 hours of code contributions per week compared to Automattic's near-4000. Additionally, WP Engine is the biggest Wordpress.com competitor.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago

The open-source side of WordPress is pretty pissed off at Matt right now. The Slack is heavily downvoting/disliking all of this.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wordpress is a security hole anyway, use something else if you have to use plugins for your usecase.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Just not Drupal. Its still pretty bad.

[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago

Hopefully this spurs Automaticc to put more attention into the fediverse. With Tumblr moving to use Wordpress code that could bring all tumblr blogs to the fediverse and get more programmers and resources interested

[–] subignition@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (18 children)

Fuck WordPress, but also it kinda sounds like WordPress is more in the right here.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] ravhall@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago

Wordpress is junk.

load more comments
view more: next ›